News - Voters’ views: Jorge Caspary
Rhonda Buie:
San Diego, California
|
Nancy Pew:
Seattle, Washington
|
Jim Hill:
Sudbury, Mass.
|
Jorge Caspary:
Tallahassee, Florida
|
Gary Webb:
Sacramento, C’fornia
|
Neil Sherman:
Germantown, Tenn.
Send us your comments on Jorge’s views using the form below.
Your comments:
I can’t possibly believe that anyone would believe that Bush crafts his policies on principle. What basis has he given for invading Iraq? Before the invasion his administration claimed that Saddam possessed WMD and was a threat to the US and the rest of the world. Now that that argument has been disproved, Bush has shifted his case to the potential threat that he posed. Bush has also continued to indirectly link the attacks on 9/11 to Saddam. It’s amazing how so many Americans and the American media have allowed this president continue to do this.
Enrique, Chicago, USA
I disagree with your assessment that Kerry gave confusing answers. What did Bush the Dred Scott decision have to do with anything? How is that not a confusing answer? I also disagree with your assessment that Bush needs to “stand by the law until it is changed”. What you don’t say is that Bush supports not changing the law. Abortion is clearly legal and I haven’t seen Bush ’standing’ by that law.
Carl, Oxford, USA
I thought both candidates did a good job, but Kerry was the better of the two. I like his plan. Bush has done little for me and the middle class. Down with corporate greed and up with resolutions to health care, prescriptions, taxes that benefit and support a true healthy government by the people and for the people. I believe that is the Kerry plan. I want fiscal , safety, health care and more jobs.
Sharon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Didn’t it make any difference to you (Jorge) that George, when asked to name three mistakes he has made, couldn’t even one? I somehow doubt that this was the perfect presidency.
Stephen, Dublin, Ireland
Well Jorge, you really revealed the cards there in your last paragraph. A country with the power of the USA needs a president ready to negotiate and make deals. That’s the idea of a democracy, to find a consensus. Whatever principles Bush has (and I haven’t seen many) he will stick to right or wrong. And that’s the point: The war in Iraq is wrong, wrong-headed and a complete disaster in global terms. But Bush is sticking to the principle of it while flipping and flopping on why we are actually there. I don’t understand how you cannot see that.
Marton, Munich, Germany
Terms & Conditions
Read source on
